Legal Opinion

Hindman v. Colvin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1907No. 6642PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Linn, J., entered January 21, 1907, denying the petitioners motion for leave to intervene and defend an action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action, in which applications for writs of prohibition and mandamus have heretofore been made to this court (46 Wash. 317, 89 Pac. 894), was commenced in the superior court of Thurston county, by W. W. Hindman, trustee, against the Great Western Coal Development and Mining Company, a corporation, to foreclose a mortgage on certain coal mining interests, personal property, and leasehold estates. The defendant entered its appearance, and one George P. Cragin was appointed its receiver. The several leasehold estates covered by the mortgage were upon certain large tracts of land belonging to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Thompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Harlan v. Eureka Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Dickson v. DowsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Coffman v. Spokane Chronicle Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hutteball v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API