Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Eureka Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1875No. 679PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe Sixth Judicial District, Eureka County. Tbis action was brought by plaintiff to recover of and from defendant the sum of three thousand one hundred and forty-four dollars, tbe value of certain ore claimed to have been sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. Tbe Jackson Mining Company was allowed to intervene without objection.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe Sixth Judicial District, Eureka County. Tbis action was brought by plaintiff to recover of and from defendant the sum of three thousand one hundred and forty-four dollars, tbe value of certain ore claimed to have been sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. Tbe Jackson Mining Company was allowed to intervene without objection. After all tbe testimony had been introduced upon the issues presented by tbe intervener, tbe plaintiff moved the court for judgment against the defendant 'for the amount prayed for in the complaint, upon the grounds; First.…

1Opinion of the Court

*94By the Court,

Hawley, C. J.:

The sale and delivery of certain ore by plaintiff Harlan to the Eureka Consolidated Mining Company, defendant, and the value thereof, were the only issues raised by the complaint and answer. The Jackson Mining Company was, by leave of the court, allowed to intervene and become a party to said action upon filing a petition, alleging: That it was the owner, and entitled to the possession of the ore; that the plaintiff and one N. P. Oopp wrongfully and unlawfully took the same, and the said N. P. Copp pretended to make sale thereof to the said defendant; that said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cornhusker Electric Co. v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. HankinsNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Westland Publishing Co. v. RoyalWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bray v. BookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Limberg v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API