Legal Opinion

State v. Aiken

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1974No. 81PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The North Carolina Controlled Substances Act, G.S. 90-86 to G.S. 90-113.8, defines a “controlled substance” to mean “a drug, substance, or immediate precursor included in Schedules I through VI of this Article.” G.S. 90-87 (5). Heroin is a substance included in Schedule I. G.S. 90-89 (b) (10).

The pertinent portions of G.S. 90-95 provide:

“Violations; penalties.— (a) Except as authorized by this Article, it is unlawful for any person:(1) To manufacture, sell or deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture, sell or deliver, a controlled substance ;

* * * *(3) To possess a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. RorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. OienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Sanderson v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API