Grant v. Asmuth
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
The complaint and answer show the following state of facts:
On February 24, 1926, the defendant, Conrad Asmuth, was driving his automobile- on a public highway in said Racine county, his wife, Loa Asmuth, being with him. Their automobile collided with an automobile driven by Grant, the plaintiff here. Thereafter said Conrad Asmuth and his wife Loa each instituted an action in tort against Grant to *460recover their respective damages arising from such collision. For convenience of trial the two actions were tried together with a single verdict, which, as modified by the trial court, resulted in a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Brickner v. KopmeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Standard Accident Insurance Co. v. RunquistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Michel v. McKennaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Britt v. BuggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Guerriero v. U-Drive-It Co. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. PruntyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.