Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Prunty
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
This is not a proper matter for summary judgment. The defendant in this action, while before the court in the previous actions that were consolidated for trial, was not a party nor was she impleaded as a defendant in the actions brought by Marie C. Prunty, individually, and Metal Mending Products against Vanden Berg and his insurer, the plaintiff here. No judgment could have been rendered against the estate of Felix L. Prunty since it was not a party to those actions.
Contribution is based on common liability, Ellis v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. (1918), 167 Wis. 392, 167 N. W. 1048, and there can…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ellis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Milwaukee General Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Grant v. AsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Milwaukee Automobile Insurance v. FeltenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Wurtzinger v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Shumaker v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.