Colonial Investment Co. v. City of Leawood
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, J.:
Both parties to this lawsuit have appealed from the rulings of the trial court in a zoning dispute.
In Count I of its second amended petition, plaintiff landowner, Colonial Investment Company, Inc., sought to estop the defendant City of Leawood from zoning the disputed tract as noncommercial; in Count II plaintiff prayed for a declaratory judgment declaring that the land was in fact zoned commercial; in Count III plaintiff asked the court to declare that Colonial had a vested right to use the land for commercial development; and in Count IV plaintiff asserted a cause of action for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hollywood Beach Hotel Co. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- United American State Bank v. Wild West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aragon & McCoy v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1996
- Robert L. Rieke Building Co. v. City of OlatheCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985