Legal Opinion

Colonial Investment Co. v. City of Leawood

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 17, 1982No. 53,399, 53,455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

Both parties to this lawsuit have appealed from the rulings of the trial court in a zoning dispute.

In Count I of its second amended petition, plaintiff landowner, Colonial Investment Company, Inc., sought to estop the defendant City of Leawood from zoning the disputed tract as noncommercial; in Count II plaintiff prayed for a declaratory judgment declaring that the land was in fact zoned commercial; in Count III plaintiff asked the court to declare that Colonial had a vested right to use the land for commercial development; and in Count IV plaintiff asserted a cause of action for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hollywood Beach Hotel Co. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. United American State Bank v. Wild West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aragon & McCoy v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1996
  5. Robert L. Rieke Building Co. v. City of OlatheCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API