Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1994No. 93-04829PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*161RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

The principal issue in Allen C. Gregory’s slip and fall action against his employer, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MOPAC), arising out of oil on the walkway of its locomotive, is the peremptory instruction that the presence of the oil violated the Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U.S.C. § 23. Because violation of the Act, vel non, was a question for the jury, we REVERSE and REMAND for a new trial.1

I

Gregory alleged that, in January 1989, while employed by MOPAC, he slipped on oil on a locomotive walkway and fell; but this action was not filed until…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Michael P. McGinn v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Raab v. Utah Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Weaver v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Richardson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Technical Packaging, Inc. v. HanchettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API