Legal Opinion

Hynes v. Sigety

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about August 4, 1977, affirmed on the opinion of McQuillan, J., at Trial Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.; Kupferman, J. P., dissents in the following memorandum. Inasmuch as the respondent-appellant had a right legitimately to question the powers of the Deputy Attorney-General to issue subpoenas under subdivision 8 of section 63 of the Executive Law, and the matter was not entirely free from doubt (see Matter of Sigety v Hynes, 38 NY2d 260,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sigety v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Kent Nursing Home v. Office of Special State Prosecutor for Health & Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sigety v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Hynes v. HartmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Sigety v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Sigety v. AbramsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  5. People v. Di MariaNew York Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API