Legal Opinion
Hynes v. Hartman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Murphy, P. J
Petitioner Hynes issued a subpoena in June of 1976 to respondent Hartman, the owner and operator of the Mosholu Parkway and Bainbridge Nursing Homes, requiring him to produce the books and records of those homes for the years 1970 through 1975. The respondent moved to quash the subpoena on the grounds that he had recently been audited by the New York State Department of Health and that there was no showing of criminality on his part. In his affidavit, Hartman never disclosed that some of the requested books and records could not be located. Suffice it to say…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RenaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Panza v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- People v. ShapolskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Hynes v. SigetyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Hynes v. SlomaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- N. A. Development Co. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Sigety v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Sigety v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Callanan Industries, Inc. v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Larisa F. v. Michael S.New York Family Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.