Legal Opinion
Dunlap v. Aulson Corp.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided July 6, 1981No. Civil Nos. 78-291-D, 78-317-D, 81-233-D, 81-234-DPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
The Court now has before it for resolution, following hearing, various motions filed by the respective parties in these con*649solidated cases.1 For purposes only of disposition of said motions, the general background of the litigation follows.
I. Background
Plaintiffs Roger and Mary Dunlap, husband and wife, are residents of Somers-worth, New Hampshire. From 1956 onward, Roger Dunlap was employed by Prime Tanning Company, situate in Ber-wick, Maine. On November 11, 1976, while so employed, he was operating a Turner Hydraulic Press, so-called, when he allegedly…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Kirsch (In Re Kirsch)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Spherex, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Chasan v. Village Dist. of EastmanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1984
- Anderson v. Booth (In Re Booth)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.