Legal Opinion
Kohut v. Ackerman & Ackerman P.C. (In re McInerney)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 1, 2015No. Case No. 11-58953; Adv. Pro. No. 13-5292Published
1Opinion of the Court
TRIAL OPINION
Thomas J. Tucker, United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. Introduction
Because of several orders previously filed, all counts, and claims in the Plaintiffs Complaint in this adversary proceeding (Docket # 1) have been resolved. The only claim that is not yet resolved is the counterclaim filed by Defendant Ackerman & Ackerman, P.C. (the “Ackerman Firm”)(Docket # 68, the “Counterclaim”). The Court held a bench trial on the Counterclaim on April 28, 2015., and took it under advisement.
The Court has considered all of the ar-. guments of the parties; all of the exhibits admitted into evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Plunkett & Cooney, Pc v. Capitol Bancorp LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Reynolds v. PolenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Morris v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Island Lake Arbors Condominium Ass'n v. Meisner & Associates, P.C.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re McInerneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.