Legal Opinion

United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 1984No. Civ. 13-95 (WCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CONNER, District Judge.

This action, a relic of a bygone era, stands as a living monument to. a prior generation of draftsmen. The Amended Consent Judgment (the “Consent Judgment” or “Consent Decree”), originally entered on March 14, 1950, ■ reflects their efforts to develop a workable solution to the antitrust problems arising from the business practices of defendant American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”). Today, the terms of the Consent Decree continue to regulate the manner in which ASCAP licenses its music inventory. Pursuant to § XVII of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Buffalo Broadcasting Co. v. American Society of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers v. Showtime/the Movie Channel, Inc., Applicant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. United States v. American Soc. of Composers, Authors & Pub.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API