Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1924No. 24,589PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTravis, J.

Appellant was convicted of the charge of unlawfully possessing a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, in violation of §1, Acts 1923 p. 107; and upon appeal alleges as errors:(1) That there was no valid and constitutional law in force regarding the possession of stills for the purpose of the manufacture of intoxicating liquors.(2) That the facts stated in the affidavit do not constitute a public offense.(3) Error in overruling motion for a new trial.(4) Error in overruling motion for arrest of judgment.

The first assignment of error is independent of, and does not rest upon a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Smith v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Board of Commissioners v. ScanlanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wayne Township v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Chism v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Gmeiner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Turner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API