Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 2017No. A16-1630; A16-1713PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge

Appellant challenges decisions of post-conviction courts in Scott and Hennepin Counties, which summarily denied his requests for relief from three driving-while-impaired convictions. Appellant argues that, the postconviction courts erred by refusing to retroactively apply Birchfield, 136 S.Ct. at 2160, Thompson, 886 N.W.2d at 224, and Trahan, 886 N.W.2d at 216,1 and by denying his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims. We conclude that the rules announced in Birchfield, Thompson, and Trahan regarding the search-incident-to-arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment’s…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Minnesota v. Raymont Michael RedmondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API