Brooks v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge
Appellant challenges decisions of post-conviction courts in Scott and Hennepin Counties, which summarily denied his requests for relief from three driving-while-impaired convictions. Appellant argues that, the postconviction courts erred by refusing to retroactively apply Birchfield, 136 S.Ct. at 2160, Thompson, 886 N.W.2d at 224, and Trahan, 886 N.W.2d at 216,1 and by denying his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims. We conclude that the rules announced in Birchfield, Thompson, and Trahan regarding the search-incident-to-arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Raymont Michael RedmondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024