Legal Opinion

Downs v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1932No. 23685. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

This is an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of certain real property, including the personalty used in connection therewith, on the ground of false representations and fraud.

The action was tried to the court, resulting in a decree rescinding and canceling the contract and awarding a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the amount paid by them on tbe purchase price, with legal interest. From that judgment tbe defendants appeal.

Tbe real estate in question was improved and equipped as a natatorium and dance ball, and bad been operated by tbe seller as a public place of amusement.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reddish v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. De Bairos v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Lombardi v. SinanidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Producers Grocery Co. v. Blackwell Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Kuehl v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gamble v. BeahmOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Golob v. George S. May International Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Sherman v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API