Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 15, 1993No. 04-91-00704-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Chief Justice.

Appellant seeks reversal of his felony conviction because part of the trial record has been lost or destroyed through no fault of his own. The State asserts, however, that appellant waived his right to appeal because appellant absconded after his conviction even though he was in custody at the time of his sentencing. We agree with appellant but disagree with the State. Appellant’s cause is reversed and remanded.

*172FACTS

A jury convicted Avelino Ortiz, Jr. (appellant) of voluntary manslaughter and taxed him with a $10,000.00 fine and sentenced him to seven years…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Walthall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Avila v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Warden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  3. State v. BrabhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. Jacob Gross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  5. Jacob Gross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API