Legal Opinion
Warden v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided March 14, 1995No. 06-93-00048-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Justice.
Cathy Warden appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance. She contends that the trial court erred in overruling her motion to suppress evidence obtained through a search. Warden contends that the evidence was seized as the result of an illegal arrest and that the evidence was inadmissible under the United States and Texas Constitutions. 1
Warden was convicted of the offense of possession of cocaine. After the court denied her motion to suppress, she pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain.
The evidence as shown by affidavit indicates that Warden and a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Santikos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brewer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- State v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Jose Escamilla v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Michael Cleveland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.