Legal Opinion

Lee v. Pauly Motor Truck Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

We are unable to discover the legal principle upon which the judgment may be sustained. The cause of action set forth in the complaint is based upon fraudulent representations made by the defendant to induce the plaintiffs to enter into the contract of purchase. The court specifically found that “the defendant made no fraudulent representations of fact to the plaintiffs to induce the sale of said truck.” In- view of this finding, which w;e find to be well supported by the evidence, the cause of. action se.t forth in the complaint falls.

The trial court evidently bottomed the judgment on a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox v. BoldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. McCampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  2. National Equipment Corp. v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Berna-Mork v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. Deming v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Russell Grader Manufacturing Co. v. BuddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API