Legal Opinion

Russell Grader Manufacturing Co. v. Budden

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

Just why the written order of October 7th was held to be the effective contract between the parties instead of the subsequent conditional sales agreement signed by both parties as of October 10th is not apparent, but inasmuch as- the parts material to our disposition of the case, namely, the description of the article, are the same in the two writings, and the trial court being entirely correct .in his final ruling that there was no showing made of any fraud perpetrated upon the defendants in connection with the taking of the order (which was necessarily the same as to the conditional sales…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boston Consolidated Gas Co. v. FolsomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Lee v. Pauly Motor Truck Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bayley Manufacturing Co. v. BowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Muska v. ApelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API