Legal Opinion

Dietzeman v. Peterson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 23, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

196 N.J. Super. 96 (1984)

481 A.2d 596

JOHN B. DIETZEMAN, PLAINTIFF,

v.

JOHN E. PETERSON AND REBECCA C. HOWE, DEFENDANTS AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS,

v.

WALTER CLEARY, III, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Morris County.

Decided January 23, 1984.

Gerald M. Compeau, Jr. for plaintiff.

David S. Cramp for defendants Peterson and Howe.

W. Stephen Leary for third party defendant Cleary.

MacKENZIE, J.S.C.

This opinion considers the interplay between and the reconciliation of Evid.R. 56(2) and Evid.R. 63(12). The specific issue is whether a non-treating physician may be allowed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Tramutola v. BortoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Tramutola v. BortoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  4. Gunter v. Fischer Scientific AmericanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Consolidated Traction Co. v. LambertsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MartiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Agha v. FeinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  3. State v. HumanikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. State v. FarthingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Brun v. CardosoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API