Legal Opinion
State v. Humanik
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 6, 1985PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
199 N.J. Super. 283 (1985)
489 A.2d 691
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOHN M. HUMANIK, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 8, 1985.
Decided February 6, 1985.
Before Judges MICHELS, PETRELLA and BAIME.
Joel I. Rachmiel argued the cause for appellant (Rachmiel and Ferdinand, attorneys; Joel I. Rachmiel, on the brief).
Marijean Raffetto Stevens, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General, attorney; Marijean Raffetto Stevens, of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State v. BreakironSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- John Michael Humanik, Jr. v. Howard Beyer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- State v. DeliberoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.