Agha v. Feiner

At issue in this Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA) case is the substantive admissibility of an MRI 1 report prepared by a non-testifying radiologist and relied on by plaintiffs testifying physicians. One of the testifying physicians, a chiropractor, acknowledged that he was not qualified to interpret an MRI, and the other, an anesthesiologist, although capable, did not, in fact, review the MRI films. Over defendants’ objections, both witnesses were permitted, based on the MRI report, to testify that plaintiff suffered a disc herniation, which was the only objective evidence of…