Legal Opinion

Connor v. . Hayworth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHENCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Plaintiff alleged and offered evidence tending to show that on 6 December, 1929, while working in a mine at the bottom of the shaft, a long slab or rock fell upon him, inflicting serious and permanent injury in that his thigh was broken, and in addition, he suffered a compound fracture of both bones of the lower leg. A few minutes after he was injured he was carried to the Memorial Hospital at Asheboro, which was operated by the defendant, C. A. Hayworth. Plaintiff said: "Dr. Lambert was Dr. Hayworth's assistant. I did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Pendergraft v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Chadwick v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler ex rel. Jones v. LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butler v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Covington v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API