Rettig Beverage Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The main question raised on this appeal’is whether, in deciding a case of this kind, the court is governed by the rule of evidence which is applied in law cases or the rule applied in equity eases. The question is difficult to state understandingly before the pleadings and the facts of the ease and the substance of the decision are given.
*741The Pleadings.
The United States filed a bill in equity under section 22, tit. 2, of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ami. Supp. 1923, § 10138%k), charging the respondent corporation and its officers with maintaining on its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Brennan v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Union Pac. R. v. SyasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Dean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greenfield v. BlumenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Braunstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- (PC) Caruso v. HillDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Drake v. MehtaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Quezada v. AkabikeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.