Legal Opinion

Greenfield v. Blumenthal

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 12, 1934No. 5204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below Alfred C. Blumenthal, after final hearing, was awarded $151,575, together with interest thereon from October 16, 1930, to the date of payment, against Albert M. Greenfield. The claim of Blumenthal was based on an alleged contract of Greenfield to pay Blumenthal one-half of commissions alleged to have been paid Greenfield by Fox for the sale of the latter’s stock. Passing by the question whether equity has jurisdiction of such simple contract obligations, as no such question is raised, we come to the merits of Greenfield’s appeal from the decree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Latta v. KilbournSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Campbell v. Northwest Eckington Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Vigel v. HoppSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Hamilton v. FaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Pennsylvania Knitting Mills v. BayardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moyer v. BrownellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Bonavitacola v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API