Legal Opinion
(PC) Quezada v. Akabike
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 19, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00797Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALVARO QUEZADA, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00797-DAD-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION 13 v. (Doc. 22) 14 SHERMAN, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Mr. Quezada alleges that the defendants failed to provide him adequate medical care and 18 accommodation and retaliated against him because he engaged in protected conduct. (Doc. 22). In 19 his original complaint and first amended complaint, (Docs. 1, 15), the Court found that Plaintiff 20 failed to state a cognizable claim for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Toguchi v. Soon Hwang ChungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.