Legal Opinion

Barnhardt v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant Barnhardt was convicted under an indictment charging him with having aided and abetted one O. C. Osborne in embezzling 250 pounds of seed cotton belonging to Alfred Sohm.

Osborne admitted his guilt and implicated Barnhardt. The court gave an instruction on the question of the sufficiency of the corroboration of an accomplice to sustain a conviction, and in the ■ instruction the jury was told that the corroboration “is sufficient if there is any evidence to warrant you in convicting the defendant which, taken with all the other evidence in the case, convinces you of the guilt of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bourland v. McKnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Hammock v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. Woodson v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Bertrand v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
  5. Rand v. WaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Caton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Hays v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Mechanics' Insurance v. Inter-Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Heeb v. PrysockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API