Legal Opinion

Heeb v. Prysock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1952No. 4-9675PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Appellant, Heeb, who was the defendant below, had about 210 acres of rice, and each of the appellees, Prysock, Underwood, Blanton and Stough had acreage planted in cotton which was either adjacent to or near said rice land. In July of 1949, Heeb employed the Terry Aircraft Company to spray his rice with 2,4-D in liquid form. While the spray was being applied to the rice appellees’ cotton crops were damaged, as it is alleged, because of appellant’s negligence in that the airplane flew over their crops, allowing the poison to escape and “settle” on their cotton, in that said poison drifted from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. McKennon v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Barnhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Burns v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Gibson v. Lee Wilson CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Emelwon, Inc. And Kaiel Thompson McAlister v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Pendergrass v. LovelaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Boroughs v. JoinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Lawler v. SkeltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API