Legal Opinion

Crooke v. Gilden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1992No. S91A1190, S91X1191PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Chief Justice.

Gilden brought this action for specific performance of a contract and equitable partition of real estate. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted Gilden’s motion for summary judgment as to her claim for equitable partition. The trial court granted Crooke’s motion for summary judgment in the action for specific performance on the ground that the agreement was void because an “illegal and immoral” relationship between the parties constituted an implicit part of the consideration for the contract. The parties filed cross-appeals.

1. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shannondoah, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Abrams v. MassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Moore v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. R.R.R. Ltd. Partnership v. Recreational Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Boot v. BeelenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API