Legal Opinion
Boot v. Beelen
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 13, 1997No. A96A1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Harold R. Banke.
Catherine Beelen, a/k/a Tineke Beelen, sued Roland Boot for breach of contract. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Beelen and entered judgment on her behalf. Boot appeals, enumerating two errors.
To prevail on summary judgment, the moving party must show that no genuine issues of material fact remain to be tried and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant summary judgment as a matter of law. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991). Viewed in that light, the record shows that Boot, a Dutch…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Kemira, Inc. v. Williams Investigative & Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Talley v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Whitmire v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Crooke v. GildenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nolan Road West, Ltd. v. PNC Realty Holding Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Community & Southern Bank v. Clear Creek PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Carolyn Ann Lewis v. Paul B. IknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Harpreet Singh Walia v. Gursharanjit Singh WaliaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Richard Cates, Administrator of the Estate of Roger D. Cates v. Cynthia Melissa BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020