State ex rel. Morris v. Handlin
South Dakota Supreme Court
Mandamus by the State of South Dakota, on the relation of AViilliam A. Morris, as Adjutant General, against J. E. Han'dlin, as State Auditor, to test the validity of a legislative enactment appropriating moneys for state militia. (2) To point two of the opinion, Plaintiff cited: Act Cong. June 3, 1916, Seos. 57, in; Const. Art. 13, Sec. 1; Art. it, Secs; 8, 9,; Art. 12, Sec. 3; Art. 13, Sec. 1; U. S'. Const.
Read the full summary
Mandamus by the State of South Dakota, on the relation of AViilliam A. Morris, as Adjutant General, against J. E. Han'dlin, as State Auditor, to test the validity of a legislative enactment appropriating moneys for state militia. (2) To point two of the opinion, Plaintiff cited: Act Cong. June 3, 1916, Seos. 57, in; Const. Art. 13, Sec. 1; Art. it, Secs; 8, 9,; Art. 12, Sec. 3; Art. 13, Sec. 1; U. S'. Const. Art. 1, Sec. 10; Attorne)'- General Report pp. 123-132; Laws 1903, Chap. 185, Secs. 27, 28, 32, 44, 46, 59, 62; Laws T913, Chap. 267; U. S. Comp. St. Secs. 1625-166T (1909 Supplement, pp.…
1Opinion of the Court
McCOY, J
Prior to the 21st day of June, 1916, there had been organized in this state a militia regiment known and designated as the Fourth South Dakota Infantry. On the 2i'st day of June, 1916, the Governor of this state, acting upon instructions from the President of the United States calling cut the state militia for the purpose of protecting territory of the United States from threatened invasion and aggression on the part of Mexico, promulgated his order requiring the mobilization of the members of said Fourth South Dakota Infantry. Immediately thereafter said regiment was mobilized at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Booth v. Town of WoodburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Cutting v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Speer v. School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- State ex rel. Atwood v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Hart v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- State ex rel. Mills v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.