Luna v. Bowen
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
This is a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3). Plaintiffs are all claimants for disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. and 1381 et seq.. Plaintiffs allege their claims for benefits have been improperly adjudicated due to vague, unclear, illegal, and misleading policies of the Secretary of Health and Human Services regarding the evaluation of pain for disability purposes. Jurisdiction is found under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1402.
Now before me are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987