Legal Opinion
State v. Blooflat
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 29, 1994No. C1-94-339PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Archie Bennett Blooflat contends the evidence was insufficient to support his three criminal convictions because the state did not prove that the charged offenses occurred in the same county in which the ease was tried.
FACTS
On March 1, 1992, appellant was arrested after St. Cloud police found him next to his car, which was straddling railroad tracks within the city limits of St. Cloud. Appellant was subsequently charged with driving while intoxicated, refusing to submit to chemical testing, and driving after cancellation of his license.
The City of St. Cloud…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. GulleksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- In RE STATE (STATE v. JohansonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. EibensteinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. ClowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.