Legal Opinion

Elston v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 18, 1991No. C-2-88-904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOLSCHUH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to Title 45, U.S.C., § 51 et seq., the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”). This case is now before the Court upon the motion of defendant and third-party plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) for summary judgment. In her response to defendant’s motion, plaintiff requests sanctions against defendant Conrail pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

I

This action was brought by plaintiff Margaret A. Elston against defendant Conrail alleging a cause of action for injuries under…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Strykowski v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, D/B/A Metra/metropolitan Rail, ("Metra")Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API