Legal Opinion

State v. Ness

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1954No. File 9388PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The defendants were tried in the municipal court of Canton on a complaint charging them with assault and battery upon the person of Godfrey Krutch and found guilty. Reversal of the judgment is sought on the grounds (1) that the judgment is void in that the municipal court of the City of Canton was not legally established; (2) that the evidence adduced was insufficient to warrant submission to the jury; (3) that the court erred in restricting cross-examination by counsel for defendants; (4) that misconduct of the State’s Attorney caused prejudice against defendants; and (5) that the 'court did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  3. Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Wendt v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. The Marckel Co. v. ZitzowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fredrick v. DreyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Weiner v. HansNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. Court of Probate of Colleton CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. In Re HansNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. SmejkalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API