Legal Opinion
State v. Smejkal
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1986No. 15266PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WUEST, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by the State of South Dakota from an intermediate order of the trial court which granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained with a search warrant. We reverse.
On May 11, 1984, law enforcement officers conducted a search of the Keith Smej-kal (Smejkal) farm and discovered a large quantity of marijuana. Indictments were brought against Smejkal for possession of more than ten pounds of marijuana and distribution of more than one-half pound of marijuana. SDCL 22-42-6, 22-42-7.
The trial court granted Smejkal’s motion to suppress the evidence by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Nofire v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. NunezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State v. DriscollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Lippold v. Meade Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. EscalanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990