Legal Opinion
Juan R. Grogan, Jr. v. Joseph Mongold, et al.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 23, 2026No. 5:26-cv-00309Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JUAN R. GROGAN, JR., ) CASE NO. 5:26-cv-309 ) ) Plaintiff, ) CHIEF JUDGE SARA LIOI ) ) vs. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER ) JOSEPH MONGOLD, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) This is a civil rights action brought by pro se plaintiff Juan R. Grogan, Jr. (“Grogan”), against several local, state, and federal defendants. Grogan, who is currently incarcerated, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2 (Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis).) In an eleven- count complaint, Grogan alleges that defendants engaged in violations of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.