Voigt v. State

Three issues are raised on this review.

1. Was there sufficient credible evidence to support the conviction?

2. Was the defendant denied his rights to due process of law and a fair and impartial trial ?

3. Was the sentence imposed unduly harsh, unreasonable and an abuse of discretion?

Sufficiency of the evidence.

The defendant contends that because the sole witness against him was an alleged accomplice with a prior criminal record that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction. We find no merit to this contention.

This court has previously held that a conviction can…