Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Mossman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 5, 1976No. 52673PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The appellants, a swimming pool construction company, appeal from a default judgment against them in the appellees’ action for damages for the appellants’ breach of an implied warranty of fitness in a contract to build a pool in the appellees’ yard, and for the appellants’ fraudulently procuring the appellees’ signature on a completion certificate prior to the completion of the job, resulting in the premature assignment of the contract and a deed to secure debt to a third-party lien creditor.

1. The verdict and judgment for $5,000 general damages was authorized by the evidence.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Gulf Refining Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. UIV CORP. v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Carter v. Marble Products Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Long v. MarionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Clark v. AenchbacherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Parsells v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Esprit Log & Timber Frame Homes, Inc. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Waller v. ScheerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API