Legal Opinion
Avid Telecom LLC v. Frankel
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 8, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00558Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Avid Telecom LLC, et al., No. CV-22-00558-TUC-JCH 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Frankel, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff Avid Telecom's1 "Motion for Reconsideration." 16 Doc. 47. Avid asks the Court to "allow for reputational damages for false light invasion of 17 privacy." Id. at 2. The Motion is fully briefed. Doc. 47 ("Motion"), Doc. 57 ("Response"), 18 Doc. 62 ("Reply"). Avid has not met the standard for reconsideration under Local Rule of 19 Civil Procedure 7.2(g)(1), so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Robyn Douglass, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Augustin GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.