Legal Opinion

Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 20, 1931No. 1180, 1186PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, District Judge.

The above two suits were heard together hy me without a jury by virtue of a stipulation to that effect. The suits are to recover for royalties due under a license agreement whereby the plaintiff granted to the defendant a nonexclusive license under letters patent owned hy the plaintiff and others to construct and operate at its plant in Oklahoma two Cross cracking units for cracking petroleum oils. The amount of royalties covered by the two suits, as stipulated by the parties, aggregates upwards of $200,000. The two suits will he treated as one for the purposes of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Steele v. DrummondSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
  2. Turner Glass Corporation v. Hartford-Empire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
  4. Demayo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. United States v. Line Material Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API