Zimmerman v. County of Kearney
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Kearney county. Heard below before Gaslin, J. cited, contending that compensation should precede or accompany appropriation: Brady v. Bronson, 45 Cal., 643; Sage v. Brooklyn, 89 N. Y., 189; Chapman v. Cate, 54 Id., 146; Mills, Eminent Horn. [2d Ed.], sec. 126; Keene v. Bristol, 26 Pa.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court for Kearney county. Heard below before Gaslin, J. cited, contending that compensation should precede or accompany appropriation: Brady v. Bronson, 45 Cal., 643; Sage v. Brooklyn, 89 N. Y., 189; Chapman v. Cate, 54 Id., 146; Mills, Eminent Horn. [2d Ed.], sec. 126; Keene v. Bristol, 26 Pa. St., 46. cited: Chapman v. Gates, 54 N. Y., 132; Sage v. Brooklyn, 89 Id., 196; Smeaton v. Martin, 57 Wis., 364; Woodruff v. Glendale, 26 Minn., 78; Com’rs v. Bowie, 34 Ala., 461; Cooley, Const.'Lim., 560; II. Corv. Fink, 18 Neb., 86.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The appellants are the owners of certain real estate in road districts numbers 13. and 20, in Kearney county. That county now is, and for some years has been, under township organization. Some time prior to the commencement of this action the board of supervisors of that county ordered certain section lines in said road districts, along *621which appellants’ land lay, to be opened and worked as public roads. Appraisers were appointed and the damage of appellants assessed. The county board allowed but one per cent on the dollar of the amount of damages assessed by the appraisers.
From this order…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Republican Valley Railroad v. FinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lewis v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Livingston v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Barrett v. HandNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Morris v. Washington CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Propst v. Cass CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.