Legal Opinion

Propst v. Cass County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1897No. 7317PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

On the 3d day of November, 1877, Martin Propst conveyed to Catherine Propst, his wife, the plaintiff herein, *737certain land situate in Cass county, this state, the reason and purpose of the conveyance being, it is stated, to preserve the property for the use of.the family, and to prevent it being squandered by Martin Propst, who had become so addicted to the use of intoxicants as to wholly or partially incapacitate him for the transaction of business. It appears that on the 25th of August, 1893, he was placed under guardianship on account of his incapable condition, produced by long continued…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harmon v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Welton v. DicksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wagner v. Gage CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Livingston v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Schaller v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kime v. Cass CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Nine Mile Irrigation District v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bridge v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Johnson v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Weinel v. Box Butte CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API