Republican Valley Railroad v. Fink
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Broady, J. Stowell & Flagg, 11 Mass., 363. Calkin v. Baldwin, 4 "Wend., 667. 1 Eedfield Eailways, 334. Mason v. Ft. FI., 31 Me., 215. Aldrich v. FI. FI., 1 Am. Ey. Cases, 206. Mills Eminent Domain, §§ 88, 89. FFarilin v. FI. Ft., 21 N. W. E., 623. Sherman v. FI. FI., 40 Wis., 645. FI. JR,, v. Benitos, 10 Am. & Eng.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Broady, J. Stowell & Flagg, 11 Mass., 363. Calkin v. Baldwin, 4 "Wend., 667. 1 Eedfield Eailways, 334. Mason v. Ft. FI., 31 Me., 215. Aldrich v. FI. FI., 1 Am. Ey. Cases, 206. Mills Eminent Domain, §§ 88, 89. FFarilin v. FI. Ft., 21 N. W. E., 623. Sherman v. FI. FI., 40 Wis., 645. FI. JR,, v. Benitos, 10 Am. & Eng. E. E. Cases, 122. 2 Coke Inst., 200. Almg v. Harris, 5 Johns., 175. Scidmore v. Smith, 13 Id., 322. Doe v. JR. P., 1 Ga., 524. Clark v. Brown, 18 Wend., 220. Keith v. Tilford, 12 Neb., 271. Wade Notice, § 1127. Horbeck…
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff to recover damages for injury to certain real estate of the defendant during the years 1880, 1881, and 1882. The cause of action is stated as follows: “ That the defendant (plaintiff in error) during the years A. d. 1880, 1881, and 1882, did unlawfully and with force and arms, break, enter, occupy, and ever since has occupied a portion of the close of plaintiff heretofore described, and then and there dug, excavated, removed, and piled up the soil and earth of the plaintiff, and then and there built and laid their line…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Omaha & North Western Railroad v. MenkNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
- Ray v. Atchison & Nebraska R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blackwell, Enid & Southwestern Railway Co. v. BeboutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Hull v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- Lewis v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Livingston v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. CassedyMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.