Taylor v. Hughes
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bryant
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting a new trial to the plaintiff after a verdict of not guilty for the defendant. It was first before us on a motion for leave to appeal, which was granted.
This is a cause of action arising under the Dram-shop Act. The appeal of the defendant alleges (1) that there was not sufficient evidence on behalf of the plaintiff to sustain a verdict of guilty, and, if that had been the verdict of the jury, it could not have been allowed to stand, and (2) that the alleged impropriety of certain instructions relating to contributory negligence and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- King v. HaleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Casey v. BurnsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Danhof v. OsborneIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Lester v. BugniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Hill v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nelson v. AraizaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Rovekamp v. Central Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Vasic v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Barrett v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Tezak v. CooperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.