Nelson v. Araiza
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dooley
Plaintiff, Deborah Nelson, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries under section 14 of article VI of the Dramshop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 43, par. 135). At the close of plaintiff’s case the defendant tavern owners moved for a directed verdict based on the affirmative defense of complicity. The circuit court of Cook County directed a verdict for defendants. The appellate court reversed and remanded for a new trial, deciding that complicity was an issue of fact. (43 Ill. App. 3d 685.) We granted plaintiff’s petition for leave to appeal under Rule 315 (58 Ill. 2d R.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Mitchell v. Shoals, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Hackett v. SmelsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Meier v. PociusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Barrett v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Charles v. SeigfriedIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Anderson v. MoulderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Kingston v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Morris v. Farley Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.