Blackman v. Wright
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
This is a case of first impression in Pennsylvania and requires us to determine whether the intentional striking of an uninsured pedestrian by an uninsured driver can properly be considered a “motor vehicle accident” under the Assigned Claims Plan, 75 Pa. C.S.A. § 1751 et seq. Because we find such intentional action cannot be considered an “accident” under the statute, we conclude that the court properly determined appellant to be ineligible for statutory benefits and we affirm the order and judgment which denied appellant’s post-trial motions. 1
On May 9, 1994, appellant,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Gene's Restaurant, Inc. v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Coretsky v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cigna v. Exec. Risk Indemnity and Nutmeg Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Cardwell v. Chrysler Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Downingtown Area SD v. Chester County Board of Assessment Appeals v. LTK Associates, LPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. Ex Rel. Gustine Uniontown, Inc. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Kirkpatrick v. AIU InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.