Legal Opinion
State v. Hoskins
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 2000No. CR-97-0349-APPublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 The defendant, Aaron Scott Hoskins, was convicted of premeditated murder, kidnapping, armed robbery and theft and was sentenced to death for the murder conviction and to various prison terms for the other cilmes. This is a mandatory appeal of the death sentence pursuant to Rules 26.15 and 31.2 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. The court has jurisdiction under article VI, section 5(3), of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 13-4031 (1989). We affirm the convictions and sentences.
FACTS
¶2 At 7:30 p.m., July 31, 1994, Crystel Cabral, age 18, left…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HickmanArizona Supreme Court · 2003
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.