Legal Opinion
State v. Hoskins
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 2000No. CR-97-0349-APPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 P.3d 997 (2000)
199 Ariz. 127
STATE of Arizona, Appellant,
v.
Aaron Scott HOSKINS, Appellant.
No. CR-97-0349-AP.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
December 29, 2000.
Janet Napolitano, Attorney General, by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, Colleen L. French, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.
Tucker Strohm Miller & Tucker, by Richard L. Strohm, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.
OPINION
JONES, Vice Chief Justice.
ś 1 The defendant, Aaron Scott Hoskins, was convicted of premeditated murder, kidnapping, armed robbery and theft and was sentenced to death…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eric Mann v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Eric Mann v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Eric Mann v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015