Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Kroll
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided October 7, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank J. Kronenberg, S.
The question in this proceeding is whether assets of the decedent which were transferred by his guardian to the I. O. O. F. Home may be reclaimed by his estate upon the ground that the transfer was invalid.
*134The decedent, after residing in Buffalo most of his life, emigrated to Florida. In 1953, while in his eighties, his health became poor. The Orange County Court of Florida adjudged him incompetent and appointed a guardian of his person and estate. The decedent tried living in nursing homes in Florida, but found them unsatisfactory and requested of his guardian that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Carter v. . BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- United Merchants' Realty & Improvement Co. v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Ramsay v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Pfohl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Smith v. Merritt Savings & Loan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Delehanty v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
- Estate of Pfohl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978